THE DEATH OF A POLICEMAN CONTINUED

The Death of A Policeman continued

This article is another in the series The Death of A Policeman. It will not be to long,  The "Death Force" That kills police officers is also trying harder than usual to kill me and my family. I believe it has to do with the election, some presidents and candidates work closely with the force that kills police officers, they seem to be much more active now during this time of that cycle.  

The subject though I want to talk about is bringing our police deaths down below 100 each year. To accomplish that is an attainable goal. I have been writing about a speed limit for all Criminal Justice people, something that the State Troopers or Highway patrol work with the law officers of their states to determine. A speed limit that the officer would not exceed, and it would have to, of course, be relative to the road conditions. Each law officer has a different ability to speed. Some are close to race car driver caliber, some are over weight or have bad hearts. This week in Southern California I was talking to a sheriffs officer about this in Norco and he remarked, that speed limit should not have to be established by another department, it is something every officer should make a priority for themselves and set their own high speed limit.

Our police system does not want any law officer to die in high speed activity. It is just something that our law and order groups need to do if we are going to lower our accident rate significantly to put into their minds that they are not going to die in a vehicle crash because they were going faster than they were safely able to. When every shift goes out, that point should be made and re made until it becomes second nature. When an officer gets in or on their vehicle they should make a determination about their abilities and how they feel for that day or night and set that speed limit then. It would be more practical than doing it during a high speed involvement. They should not deviate from that safe speed for them for high speed that shift. 
Each department may want to up grade their patrol vehicle forward camera abilities with zoom qualities and when possible the automatic ability to attach to the vehicle being pursued, and the abilities to transfer images to all other involved police vehicles in the areas related to the pursuit.

We have lost 46 officers to vehicle related deaths, 27 to auto accidents that many officers may have been able to avoid if they would have put that idea into their mind that they were not going to loose their life, or perhaps cost another person their life because they went over that speed limit they had established as reasonable according to their abilities and health, in the given situation. Saving lives is one of the top priorities of good police work and officer lives are included.

WAR POLICY OF PLANET EARTH

War Policy Of Planet Earth



 The White House worked the execution bombing of Jihadi John of ISIS with just enough time for a retaliation from ISIS before the 2015 G20 Summit in Turkey, to spark another world crisis like Arab Spring, and attempt to encourage a series of demonstrations and riots in the US to quell resistance there and build a new international terrorist conflict in the world

We are going to see to many My Lai Massacres and dead Doctors Without Borders, innocent children and men and women brutally killed to continue in an ISIS - G20 conflict of this kind. It is more like another Arab Spring, or a similar time in the US when an evil force was using people like Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown in a way that got them killed. Trayvon Martin was killed while beating up the neighbor hood watch captain, and Michael Brown was killed during a police stop after robbing a store in Ferguson, Missouri. The police and neighbor hood watch home security group had legal jurisdiction in cases of this nature, except in the minds of those people under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or possessed by an evil spirit or witch, or those considering as acceptable a revolutionary position that would attempt to rationalize sedition, revolution or treason in America, or those attempting to create an election fraud. 

Comcast and the White House manipulated both incidents into an act that killed many police officers and people, and caused the First Amendment to be ignored by the violence and riots that racked the world from Arab Spring to the US elections.

As it stands the ISIS - G20 conflict looks like another terrifying crime by both sides, and the needless destruction of many innocent people and priceless old landmarks, It needs to be stopped right now, and a legal, 21st Century arbitration began before we end up in another war like French Vietnam that accompanied the ravaging of China, by the Socialists of The New World Order, and others like Monsanto using brutal chemical poison, and the use of an unsuspecting world to destroy that old civilization. This same effect is being initiated and taking off in the Middle East and Africa by ISIS and the G20 again. As well, perhaps a precursor to a nuclear war. Similar to the small wars and incidents that took place in the 1920s and 1930s that lead up to the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Our war policy is actually last century, nearly pre nuclear and should be considered more sensibly by the US, and mankind. 

The earth's war policy is pure corruption and one of the most terrible threats the earth and it's life factor face, with the powerful weapons proliferating the world today. It shows a criminal form of insanity by the G20 to go along with this type of Social indiscretion that is more terrifying than many, many other forms of terrorist activity, when the worlds most powerful countries on the planet The G20, show no more responsibility for the possible destruction the world faces today. It is not practical. It is not something the world would place their trust in, the G20.

.

1972 Munich Olympics

     Auction Of Commemorative plate, 1972 Munich Olympics.

                                          
                             

PSbD is auctioning a commemorative plate from a donation, of the 1972 Munich Olympics to help cover some of our equipment costs and other expenses.

For obvious reasons the biding will begin at $300,000.

And will close when the accepted amount is received.

We appreciate your consideration!

Please send bids to; 

policesoftwarebydavid@gmail.com.  

REDUCING THE DANGER OF SOME OF OUR NUCLEAR THREATS

WORKING TO REDUCE A NUCLEAR THREAT

Reducing The Danger Of Our Power Plants

We are working to take the danger out of the infamous nuclear power plant. The plant it's self has many sound features. The danger is in the nuclear core or the heavily polluting coal fueled furnaces, and the extravagant, polluting waste that accompanies these plants today. 

We need funding to move forward here. Crowd funding is the stage we are at now. This stage is essential to the success of this project. 

We are working to create a coordinated effort to bring biogas produced from sewage into the fuel process. Biogas is, when utilized with oxygen, one of the hottest fuels available. In the cutting torch the fuel acetylene when mixed with the right amount of oxygen can cut thick steel. The burners' in the nuclear and coal fueled power plants do not need anything that hot. The burners using biogas will have no problem in a well built heating core, heating water to the temperatures needed to run the same large turbines GE and other power plant companies build for nuclear power. The difference is there is no nuclear contamination of the power plant or the water or steam escaping the power plant involved in the biogas plants. There are more advantages as well, as if these weren't enough. The steam produced in the biogas plant can be used to produced distilled water. If it is a coastal power plant salt water can be used and salt becomes a by product as well as distilled water which can be added to the cities water supply to reduce the water shortage of the large coastal cities during these drought years that could last into the thirties, as it did in the  early part of the last century. Another feature is tsunami's, earthquake, and war problems do not have the same deadly nuclear complications if the nuclear plant should become threatened it can be shut down almost instantly. Cost is another serious advantage over Biogas over nuclear.

Yesterday I went to a hospital down towards the San Onofre nuclear power plant at San Clemente where I was doing some PR work regarding the eventual removal of the nuclear core from US power plants and facilitating the replacement of the core with a biogas steam producing, natural gas furnace, and structure. We will eventually see this happen with most nuclear and coal fueled plants in the world. The Standard oil, GE group want control of the World Sewage structure before they tip their hand on the true value of biogas, a renewable energy source from sewage, for replacing and fueling the heating cores in the existing nuclear power plants with Biogas, or Liquefied Methane Gas or LNG. This type of fuel will remove from our planet, sewage as a pollutant as well as nuclear waste and nuclear cooling water as pollutant's. Probably the most important reason to convert the world sewage to clean natural gas for most if not all of the  power plants in America. As well as the production of billions of gallons of LNG for fuel.

Another powerful reason for converting sewage to LNG is because in the drilling for natural gas, Fracking while drilling for LNG has become so problematic and destructive in the world. Another very serious problem in drilling and Fracking for LNG is the amount of helium and deposits of highly radioactive gas, like Radon gas that is being found in that gas. Helium is a product of the natural uranium half life and decay, helium and Radon gas is found in a great deal of the LNG from inside the earth. This is in fact not the case with Liquified Natural Gas produced and refined from sewage. You do not find  helium or uranium byproduct in this gas, it will warrant the new effort and great rewards from powering our new electric power plants on LNG from sewage. A safe renewable energy source. Not LNG from under ground Fracking. I believe it will also have a very positive effective on global warming as well.

The Biogas Plant just makes good sense. It rids the World of most sewage and a great deal of nuclear waste. It's a renewable energy source and is one of the most important things we can do for the Earth right now. I want to make a personal request from all of you and your friends to help fund the first stages of this effort for the planet and it's health

We also do radiation testing. 

Uranium is becoming one of the most considered elements in America today. 

We will test your property your jewelry your Jade Art or other objects of importance to you that may have a radioactive contamination that you would like to be sure of.

For the cost it can become one of the most reassuring steps for you and your families safety you take this year.

Contact us at,

logic872@gmail.com

SENIOR STRATEGIST

SENIOR STRATEGIST for our Funding Department.

We are a Publication involved in nuclear safety in the US and Abroad.

We are also involved in the future use of Biogas and other health issues 

Pertaining to renewable energy sources. 

This position would require a professional knowledge and skill to take over 

And run our Funding Division.

Acquiring a sound knowledge of our industry can be accomplished without difficulty, 

Being a person that is capable of handling the funding department for our endeavor needs to be already a part of your abilities.

We are looking for someone who will correlate their technique to enhance a sound group doing positive things for the Planet and Man's future, while earning an income from $1m to $5m a year. 

We are in the start up stage

Please contact...... DAVID BROWN Renewable Energies & Logic,

at,

logic872@gmail.com

The following is a quote from an excerpt from an article about the Civil War, that were some of the related causes of the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln

"Abraham Lincoln: Foreign Affairs

A key part of Abraham Lincoln's military strategy rested upon an effective blockade of the South's 3,500 miles of shoreline, including a dozen major ports and nearly two hundred inlets, bays, and navigable rivers. This was an almost impossible task for a nation with only a handful of naval ships. By the war's end, however, Lincoln had commissioned about five hundred ships, with an average of 150 on patrol at any one time. These ships captured or destroyed approximately fifteen hundred blockade runners. On the other hand, five out of six blockade runners evaded capture, enough to allow Britain to argue that it was a "paper blockade" not recognizable by international law. Most of this cargo, however, was lightweight luxury items, small munitions, and medicines. On the export side, the Confederacy shipped but a small percentage of its cash-earning cotton crop abroad during the war, five hundred thousand bales compared to 10 million bales for the three years prior to the start of the Civil War.

Foreign Recognition and Intervention in the War

The issue of the blockade's effectiveness became the major foreign policy question in the first few years of the war. The Confederacy confidently expected England to escort Confederate cotton vessels or to send British merchant and war ships to southern ports to pick up vitally needed cotton. To hasten this active intervention, the Confederacy informally cut off most cotton exports in 1861. Surprisingly, England took no official action to break the blockade and even tolerated the seizure by the Union of British ships trading with the Confederacy. Nor did England ever officially extend diplomatic recognition to the Confederacy.

This is not to say that the failure of England and other European countries officially to support the Confederacy was a foregone conclusion. Nor is it to say that no aid was extended from England to the Confederate war effort. Far from it. At several times during the war, both England and France came close to recognition and to intervention. It took all the skill of America's minister to England, Charles Francis Adams, the grandson of President John Adams and the son of President John Quincy Adams, to keep England out of the war.

Southern Belligerency Status

The first crisis occurred when England issued a proclamation of neutrality, which rested upon the logic of the Union's declared blockade. According to English reasoning, although Lincoln proclaimed the rebels to be insurrectionists and thus not recognizable under international law as a belligerent power engaged in war, his declared blockade was an act of war, which would have to be conducted against a sovereign state. Thus Lincoln had actually granted belligerency status to the Confederacy and thereby forced foreign powers to do the same. By proclaiming neutrality, England afforded the Confederacy the status of a belligerent power. Other European nations followed England's lead. Belligerency status gave the Confederacy the right, according to international law (signed by European nations after the Crimean War in 1856), to contract loans and to purchase arms from neutral nations. It also allowed England to provide safe harbors for both Union and Confederate warships and merchant vessels, to build blockade runners and warships for the Confederacy, and to formally debate in Parliament the merits of active intervention.

The delicacy of the situation exploded into near battle when two Confederate diplomats, James Mason and John Slidell, were seized by the U.S. Navy from a British ship, the Trent, en route to England. England's Prime Minister, Lord Palmerston, sent Lincoln an ultimatum demanding an apology and the release of Mason and Slidell, and ordered troops to Canada in preparation for war. He also seized all English shipments to the U.S., including a vital supply of saltpeter, the principal ingredient of gunpowder, of which the Union was in desperately low supply. Lincoln had little choice but to release Mason and Slidell, although he avoided a public apology. England, greatly relieved, refused to press the issue.

For the remainder of the war, English shipbuilders constructed dozens of lightweight blockade runners for the Confederacy as well as several warships. The C.S.S. Alabama and Florida sunk sixty-four American merchant ships in the course of the war. In France, Louis Napoleon sent thousands of French soldiers into Mexico to overthrow the regime of Benito Juérez in hopes of making the nation a French colony. He unofficially supported the Confederacy but stopped short of formal recognition. In the summer of 1862, a coalition of European nations—Britain, France, Russia, Austria, and Prussia—came close to offering to mediate the war, which would have been tantamount to recognizing Confederate independence.

In the end, however, no European nation offered mediation nor extended recognition of the Confederacy. Among the reasons undermining active European intervention were several principal considerations. Economically, there were developments that shifted trade relations to emphasize the North's economic ties with Europe. To begin with, huge cotton exports in 1857-1860 had enabled English manufactures to stockpile inventories that carried them through much of the war. Additionally, new sources of cotton in Egypt and India replaced the southern supply after 1862. Furthermore, the Union became a major consumer of British iron, ships, armaments, and woolen uniforms and blankets, which absorbed the decline in the U.S. market for English cotton textiles. At the same time, crop failures in western Europe in 1861 and 1862 increased European dependence on American grain and flour, making King Corn as powerful as King Cotton.

Socially, the open hostility of England's working class to the Confederacy as a nation of aristocrats and slavemasters countered the support for the Confederacy by English members of the upper class. Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation served to transform British antislavery sentiment into strong political opposition to the Confederacy. On the diplomatic front, there was a delicate balancing act between France and England, as neither side wanted to be the first to recognize Confederate independence lest the other use it to foment a new alliance with the Union.

All of these factors came to play in a series of diplomatic flourishes and sentiment shifts that reflected the battlefield fortunes of Union armies. But nothing was perhaps more consequential than the effect of the Emancipation Proclamation when combined with Lincoln's iron determination to win the war. Once the war became a crusade to destroy slavery, and once the Union Army presented itself as an army of liberation, rather than just an army of national self-preservation, it was almost impossible for England to intervene on the side of the Confederacy. British public opinion had become strongly abolitionist, and no government could have taken the other side."

ONE OF THE MAJOR REASONS FOR PRESIDENT LINCOLN'S DEATH II

Part II

The following is a quote from an excerpt from an article about the Civil War and some of the related causes of the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln

"The Alabama claims were a diplomatic dispute between the United States and Great Britain that arose out of the U.S. Civil War. The peaceful resolution of these claims 7 years after the war ended set an important precedent for solving serious international disputes through arbitration, and laid the foundation for greatly improved relations between Britain and the United States.
The controversy began when Confederate agents contracted for warships from British boatyards. Disguised as merchant vessels during their construction in order to circumvent British neutrality laws, the craft were actually intended as commerce raiders. The most successful of these cruisers was the Alabama, which was launched on July 29, 1862. It captured 58 Northern merchant ships before it was sunk in June 1864 by a U.S. warship off the coast of France. In addition to the Alabama, other British-built ships in the Confederacy Navy included the Florida, Georgia, Rappahannock, and Shenandoah. Together, they sank more than 150 Northern ships and impelled much of the U.S. Merchant Marine to adopt foreign registry. The damage to Northern shipping would have been even worse had not fervent protests from the U.S. Government persuaded British and French officials to seize additional ships intended for the Confederacy. Most famously, on September 3, 1863, the British Government impounded two ironclad, steam-driven "Laird rams" that Confederate agent James D. Bulloch had surreptitiously arranged to be built at a shipyard in Liverpool.
The United States demanded compensation from Britain for the damage wrought by the British-built, Southern-operated commerce raiders, based upon the argument that the British Government, by aiding the creation of a Confederate Navy, had inadequately followed its neutrality laws. The damages discussed were enormous. Charles Sumner, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, argued that British aid to the Confederacy had prolonged the Civil War by 2 years, and indirectly cost the United States hundreds of millions, or even billions of dollars (the figure Sumner suggested was $2.125 billion). Some Americans adopted this argument and suggested that Britain should offer Canada to the United States in compensation. Such proposals were not taken seriously by British statesmen, but they convey the passion with which some Americans viewed the issue.
After years of unsuccessful U.S. diplomatic initiatives, a Joint High Commission meeting in Washington, DC, during the early part of 1871 arrived at the basis for a settlement. The British Government expressed regret for its contribution to the success of Confederate commerce raiders. This agreement, dated May 8, 1871, and known as the Treaty of Washington, also established an arbitration commission to evaluate the merit of U.S. financial claims on Britain. In addition, the treaty addressed Anglo-American disputes over boundaries and fishing rights. The arbitration commission, which issued its decision in September 1872, rejected American claims for indirect damages but did order Britain to pay the United States $15.5 million as compensation for the Alabama claims."